 |
| Euro-American Genocide Complaint Filing/U.N. |
INSERT DATEPetitions Team email: tb-petitions@ohchr.org or fax: +41 22 917 9022 (Switzerland) RE: Complaint of Human Rights Violations Charging the United States Federal Government with the Genocide of European-American Christians “There is no greater sorrow on earth than the loss of one’s native land.” Euripides, 431 BC I hereby file a formal complaint with the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, charging the United States federal government with violating human rights law by perpetrating GENOCIDE against myself and other European-American Christian sovereign Citizens through immigration laws, policies and procedures. I further charge that federal immigration and naturalization laws violate the U.N. Genocide Convention of 1948, international customary law, international treaty law, and U.S. law. The U.N. Genocide Convention, Article II, Section C defines genocide in part as “Deliberately inflicting on the group (national, ethnic, racial, or religious) conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”. (Citations on relevant international customary and treaty law, as well as U.S. federal law and legal decisions, are set forth below.) In 1960, European-American Christians constituted nearly 90% of the U.S. population. Because the ongoing destruction of the European-American Christian population is a serious legal, moral, cultural, social, religious, political and economic issue, and a matter of the survival of my people, and because the pace of that destruction is escalating, I petition the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, to immediately investigate this charge of genocide and to immediately make a formal request of the United States federal government to place an immediate judicial stay on all related immigration and naturalization laws. This stay must immediately halt all admissions in the U.S. of all non-European,-Christian immigrants, refugees, asylees, parolees, foreign students, temporary workers, etc. until Commissioner Arbour can complete a thorough investigation of this claim, and take appropriate steps to remedy this egregious situation. Legal remedies for the crime of genocide include “reparations” as defined by international law that “must wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and re-establish the situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had not been committed.” Therefore, I further petition the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, to immediately demand the federal government of the United States take immediate steps to re-establish the European-American Christian population to its demographic size, 90 percent, relative to the current population, as of December 9, 1948, the day on which international customary law against genocide took effect. If the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights refuses to investigate this complaint, I must assume that: (1) international law and human rights law are no longer binding on the United States of America federal government or (2) that European-American Christians, alone, are not protected by those laws. **Background of Complaint Charging U.S. federal Immigration Law, Policies, and Procedures Result in Genocide Against European-American Christians** The effect of U.S. immigration policy since 1965, when for the first time in our nation’s history, Congress permitted massive non-European immigration, has been to perpetrate genocide against the nation’s European-American Christian majority. The term “genocide” is defined here by (1) international customary law, (2) international treaty law, and (3) U.S. federal law. Today, federal immigration policy is “deliberately inflicting on” Euro-Americans “conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction in whole or in part,” one of the definitions of genocide set forth in the U.N. Genocide Convention of 1948. Under international law, the following acts are punishable offenses: “conspiracy to commit genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide, attempt to commit genocide, or complicity in genocide.” [Article II also defines genocide as (b) “causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group” and (d) “Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group”, which would include, but are not limited to, taxation and public service policies that penalize and impose undue financial hardships upon European-American Christians, while providing tax-subsidized services for non-European-Christian illegal aliens and immigrants.] Again, legal remedies for the crime of genocide include “reparations” as defined by international law that “must wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and to re-establish the situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had not been committed.” **Euro-American Christians Devastated by Non-European-Christian Immigration** In a speech on immigration and its impact upon U.S. demographics, President Clinton in June 1998 noted that, “In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States.” This unprecedented, intentional devastation of our nation’s majority population during peace time is confirmed by our national Census. In 1960, the Census found European-Americans were 89 percent of the nation’s population, compared with 81 percent in the 1790 Census, an eight-point increase that took more than 100 years. Yet the 1990 Census found the proportion of “whites” had been reduced to 75 percent of the nation’s population -- an astonishing 14-point drop in just 30 years. (Since the “non-Hispanic white” Census category includes non-European, non-Christian “whites” from North Africa, the Middle East including Israel, and the former Soviet Union -- who comprise a significant number of immigrants --the true number of White Americans of European and Christian descent is likely far lower. Grassroots efforts to create a “European-American “ category in the 2000 Census were purposefully thwarted by federal officials, making it impossible to evaluate the true scale of genocide against European-American Christians.. (In fact, the US Census Bureau reports that in 2000, 77.1 percent of Americans self-identified as “White Americans” with the acknowledgement that the “White American” category is virtually meaningless: “...[M]any Americans who are treated as part of minority groups are included in the census category “White.” This is true for most Hispanic Americans, 48.6% of whom identified racially as white, and is America's "white Hispanic" population. The 2000 Census separated the question on Hispanicity from the question on race...with the respondent having the ability to mark more than one category. It is also true for many Arab and other Middle Eastern American and North African Americans, as well as non-European Jewish Americans, since the 2000 Census conflates race and geographic/national origin: white is defined to include people with ancestral origins in Europe and the Middle East,” and then admits “Because of these inconsistencies, statistics for White Americans are rarely used for demographic, civil-rights, or other social statistical purposes.” (http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-census-2000) The sharp demographic decline of Euro-Americans is the direct result of immigration policies pursued by the U.S. government since 1965, resulting in 80 to 90 percent of all current legal immigrants coming from Third World sites such as Mexico and other parts of Latin America, Asia, Africa, the Middle East and the Caribbean. More than 98 percent of all illegal aliens amnestied -- that is, granted legal status after unlawful entry -- by the U.S. government also come from the Third World. And nearly all of the estimated 300,000 to 500,000 illegal aliens who settle each year in the U.S. are from the Third World. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by as early as 2050, well within the life span of today’s children, European-Americans will be reduced to less than 50 percent of the U.S. population. In California, European-Americans became a demographic minority by the year 1999, and will become a minority in Texas by 2015, and in Florida and New York shortly after 2016. Despite grassroots efforts to stop present genocidal immigration policies, and strong support expressed in every poll of Citizens to steeply reduce -- or halt -- all immigration, the U.S. government actions are quickly reducing the Euro-American Christian population. Since 1965, the federal immigration policy imposed upon the European-American Christian majority by the U.S. government has been both illegal and unconstitutional, for the following reasons: #1 This policy violates international customary law against genocide, binding on the U.S. government since its adoption by the U.N.. General Assembly on December 9, 1948. The Foreign Relations Law of the United States, Volume 2, Section 702, d, [c] which recognizes international customary law against genocide prohibits “Deliberately inflicting on the group (national, ethnical, racial, or religious) conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.” While just one of the legal definitions of “group” must be met under this law, European-Americans in fact meet at least two. Racially, we are White or Caucasian; ethnically we are European; 90 percent are Christian or ethnically Christian; and as 90 percent of the U.S. population in 1960, we defined the nation and shared a common origin. #2 U.S. Congress has recognized international customary law against genocide in U.S. Public Law 95-435. Enacted in 1978, Section 5 (b) states: “It is the sense of the Congress that the Government of the United States should take steps to disassociate itself from any foreign government which engages in the crime of genocide.” Since the Senate did not ratify the 1948 U.N. Genocide Convention until 1988, and Uganda, the foreign country specified in this law as guilty of genocide, also was not yet a signatory to the Convention, U.S. Public Law 95-435 can refer only to international customary law against genocide. By enacting this public law, Congress has recognized both the validity of international customary law against genocide and its applicability to acts of the federal government. #3 The U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8 both recognizes international customary law and confers on Congress the power “To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations.” #4 The U.S. Supreme Court has held international customary law binding on the U.S. government since Paquete Habana in 1900 (175 U.S. at 708). In that opinion, Justice Gray wrote: “...international law is part of our law, and must be ascertained and administered by the courts of justice of appropriate jurisdiction, as often as questions of right depending upon it are duly presented for their determination.” #5 In 1988, the U.S. Senate ratified the 1948 UN Genocide Convention,. Article II, Section C defines genocide in part as, “Deliberately inflicting on the group (national, ethnic, racial, or religious) conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”. Article IV of the Convention guarantees the right to take legal action against the U.S. government and others for violating it, stipulating those who commit genocide “shall be punished whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials, or private individuals.” #6 It, thereby, violates Article VI of the U.S. Constitution which states that “all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land.” #7 It violates U.S. Public Law 100-606 which, in accordance with Article V of the 1948 U.N. Genocide Convention, made the provisions of that Convention federal law. This statue amended Part 1 of Title 18 of the United States Code by inserting “Chapter 50A -- Genocide”. Section 1091(a),(4), defines genocide to include act(s) which “subjects the group (national, ethnical, racial, or religious) to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part” in time of peace or war. #8 Congress publicly and repeatedly declared that the 1965 Immigration Reform Act would not reduce the proportional size of the European-American majority population. Senator Robert Kennedy insisted that “the distribution of limited quota immigration can have no significant effect on the ethnic balance of the United States.” He added this “should set to rest any fear that this bill will change the ethnic, political, or economic make-up of the United States.” Senator Edward Kennedy, floor manager of the 1965 immigration bill, stated at the onset of Senate hearings that “the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset” by this legislation. #9 U.S. immigration law, policies, and procedures violate human rights law and the rights of European-American Christians specifically. **Two Separate -- Unequal & Unjust -- U.S. Immigration Policies** Since 1965, the U.S. Congress, President and executive branch and judiciary have actively imposed Third World immigration upon the U.S., where European-American Christians have always been the majority population. In stark contrast, Congress has actively opposed immigration policies that would upset the racial/ethnic makeup of five U.S. territories -- American Samoa, the Northern Marianas, the “Free Associated States” of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, and Palau -- where non-European peoples form the majority populations, for the express purpose of preserving their respective ethnic majorities. These distinct immigration policies -- one for the United States, another for five U.S. territories -- show Congress is well aware of the direct relationship between immigration and demography, and is destroying the nation’s European-American racial and ethnic demographic majority deliberately. International law against genocide is jus cogens, that is; peremptory thereby nullifying any laws which violate its principles, including all current U.S. immigration laws and policies. I seek “reparations” as defined by international law, specifically to restore the nation’s racial and ethnic mix when the law took effect in 1948. **Overview and Legal Justification of This Complaint ** * U.S. immigration policy violates international and U.S. laws against genocide * U.S. immigration policy violates human rights law * U.S. immigration law, policies, regulations and procedures are therefore null and void.
**Legal Remedies Required to Reverse Genocide** * The U.S. government must re-establish the European-American Christian population to its demographic size, 90 percent, relative to the nation’s current population, as of December 9, 1948, the day on which international customary law against genocide took effect * The U.S. government must adopt and enforce an immigration policy which admits only ethnic European-Christians until such time as the European-American Christian population again constitutes 90 percent of the total U.S. population. The government should also actively repatriate non-Citizen immigrants and deport en masse illegal aliens to expedite this outcome. European-American Christians meet the legal requirements for standing required to file this complaint. I and other European-American Christians have (1) suffered some actual or threatened injury, (b) this injury can be traced to the challenged official conduct and (c) there is a substantial likelihood the alleged injuries can be redressed by a judicial decision in our favor. **U.S. Courts Ruling on International Law & Genocide** U.S. federal courts have already issued rulings based on international customary law and international treaty law. In these cases, described below, neither the plaintiffs nor defendants were U.S. citizens or legal U.S. residents, nor did the alleged crimes occur in the United States or within its jurisdiction. In 1980, in Filartiga v. Pena-Irala (630 F. 2nd 876), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a lawsuit brought by two Paraguayan citizens against a former Paraguayan police official for the wrongful death by torture in Paraguay of a member of the plaintiff’s family. In 1985, in Von Dardel v. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (623 F. Supp. 246), the District Court in the District of Columbia ruled in favor of a lawsuit brought by Swedish citizens against the then Soviet Union for the 1945 seizure of Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg in Hungary, his subsequent imprisonment, and possible death. In 1988, in Forti v. Suarez-Mason (No. CD-87-2058-DLJ, slip op. At 7) upon reconsideration, the District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in favor of a lawsuit brought by Argentine citizens against an Argentine general for causing the “disappearance” in Argentina of a member of the plaintiff’s family. On April 12, 1995, in Xuncax v. Gramajo (Civil Action No. 91-11564-DPW), the District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled in favor of eight Guatemalan citizens in a lawsuit brought against Guatemalan General Hector Alejandro Gramajo for torturing them in Guatemala during the 1980s. The District Court ordered the General to pay the plaintiffs $42.5 million. On October 13, 1995, in Kadic v., Kardzic (Docket Nos. 94-9035; -9069), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic was subject to trial in Federal District Court in Manhattan in a suit brought by Croat and Muslim Bosnian citizens for violating their human rights in Bosnia. On June 17, 1996, the U.S. Supreme Court, without comment, allowed that ruling to stand. SUMMARY Because the ongoing destruction of the European-American Christian population of the U.S. is a serious legal, moral, cultural, social, religious, political and economic issue, and a matter of the survival of these people, and because the pace of that destruction is escalating, an immediate judicial stay on all related U.S. immigration laws must be sought from the federal government of the United States of America. This stay would halt all admissions into the U.S. of all non-European-Christian immigrants, refugees, asylees, parolees, foreign students, temporary workers, etc. until U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour can rule on this complaint. European-American Christians satisfy the legal requirements for obtaining a stay since (a) we can establish legal standing, (b) we are suffering severe injuries from ongoing U.S. immigration policies, and (c) we can show that the benefits to the European-American population of a stay on all U.S. immigration laws, regulations, and policies outweigh any possible adverse impact such a stay could have on others. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to your prompt response. INSERT YOUR NAME & CONTACT INFORMATION ---- END COMPLAINT |
| ©2004-2006 FreeSpeechForum.org |